Translate aswanidatt.com
    Translate from:

    Translate to:

The conviction of the innocent involves much more than simply the “wrong person goes to jail”. There are powerful institutional forces as play when an innocent person is convicted.Thankfully, the public’s reaction to this injustice is one of indignation, providing hope to us who still believe that is it better for one hundred guilty people go free than to convict one innocent person.

Current examples provide proof of these institutional forces. With respect to the prosecution, we can see from the Inquiry concerning Guy Paul Morin, there was an attitude of “get him at all costs” in the form of prosecutorial misconduct was a major factor at play.

There were even attempts to manufacture evidence, in particular, with respect to bogus jail house informants. Those of us in the defense bar still cringe to this day as those prosecutors who were responsible for this tragedy haven been appointed to the bench as an institutional reward for their “hard work” (not mentioning any names). Clearly, in spite of this being a wrongful conviction, institutional rewards are being handled out those who have secured convictions to the government of the day.

However, let it be made quite clear that jail house informants do not generate wrongful convictions merely because they lie. Lying does not distinguish them from the average witness. Rather, its how and why they lie, and how the prosecution depends on lying jail house informants, that makes snitching a troubling distortion of the truth-seeking process. Jail house informants lie primarily in exchange for lenience for their own crimes, although sometimes they lie for money or even publicity. In order to obtain the benefit of these lies, jail house informants must persuade the prosecutor that their lies are true. Police and prosecutors traditionally have not and cannot check these lies because the jail house informant’s information may be all the prosecution has to prove their case.

Institutional changes have been made to reduce such injustices from happening in the future.In Ontario, the use of jail house informers must be vetted in advance by a committee of senior Crown Attorneys and such a request is rarely approved to be admitted into trial. This is an institutional acknowledgment that the prejudicial effect of the use of a jail house informant outweighs any limited probative value.

There are ethical requirements that a prosecutor behave in manner consistent with a mini-Minister of Justice (Boucher v. The Queen). These ethical standards are the first to be discarded where prosecutorial misconduct has taken place in the context of a wrongful conviction. The Supreme Court of Canada stated it brilliantly:

It cannot be over-emphasized that the purpose of a criminal prosecution is not to obtain a conviction, it is to lay before a jury what the Crown considers to be credible evidence relevant to what is alleged to be a crime. Counsel have a duty to see that all available legal proof of the facts is represented: it should be done firmly and pressed to its legitimate strength but it must also be done fairly. The role of the prosecutor excludes any notion of winning or losing; his function is a matter of public duty than [sic] which in civil life there can be none charged with greater personal responsibility. It is to be efficiently performed with an ingrained sense of the dignity, the seriousness and the justness of judicial proceedings.

This type of self-regulation based on the “best traditions of the bar” or in other words, leaving it to counsel to act in a dignified manner in all ethical standards fail in those circumstances were a person is wrongfully convicted.

The police investigation is often at the heart of a wrongful conviction case. The police are given the authority and power to identify the crime, determine who the prime suspect is and to build the case for the prosecutor. In provinces such as Ontario, it is the police who also lay the charges prior to delegating the case to the prosecutor. When one looks at the police in this context, on a certain level one can understand that their role is to investigate crimes.

However, the increase in power of the police by Parliament perpetuates their tunnel vision.One need only look to Maher Arar to see how the RCMP helped render an innocent man who was then subjected to torture on flimsy evidence as a result of unchecked power. There is also the example of how the police in Ontario can now seize assets in civil court before due process has been met. Perhaps adopting a system like in B.C. where prosecutors vet the charges before they are laid can provide an additional level of protection against wrongful convictions.

These concrete examples illustrate that intentionally or not, the police are a major factor in wrongful convictions. It is the police who, depending on the case, provide the prosecutor with false confessions, biased lineups or bogus informant information. This form of police culture passes the buck by giving false or even misleading evidence to the prosecutor and then saying they are “just doing their job”. As another salient example, the police focused on Morin because of all things, Morin was considered “weird” by the police because he played the clarinet and kept bees. Not exactly the most rational and objective basis for determining who ought to be considered a prime suspect in a murder case.

It may be that the courts have had enough of this form of police culture in the context of wrongful convictions. The Supreme Court of Canada has recently upheld an Ontario Court of Appeal decision creating a tort of police negligence in terms of their role as the investigators of crime (Hill v. Hamilton-Wentworth Regional Police Services Board). The court stated the following:

Where the police investigate a suspect reasonably, but lawyers, judges or prosecutors act unreasonably in the course of determining his legal guilt or innocence, then the police officer will have met the standard of care and cannot be held liable either for failing to perform the job of a lawyer, judge or prosecutor, or for the unreasonable conduct of other actors in the criminal justice system.

Clearly, the court has indicated that each institutional actor is responsible for their part in the course of any case. The police now have a duty to ensure that with respect to their role, they no longer merely “just do their job” but now have a duty of care to the individual being investigated.

Coupled with the tort of malicious prosecution, now an individual wrongful charged can seek relief from the court against a prosecutor (in terms of a malicious prosecution) and the police force (in terms of an investigation that did not meet reasonable standards). Contrary to the hue and cry from police forces about any “chilling effect”, one hopes that the threat of litigation would require police forces to properly adequately train their officers on proper non-tunnel vision investigation.

Scientists are not immune from being part of the institutional cause of wrongful convictions.The pathologist Dr. Charles Smith is a current example. Conveniently, the Chief Coroner of Ontario has denounced Dr. Smith but where was he when the esteemed doctor was conducting autopsies and testifying in court? Clearly, there was a lack of institutional safeguards or even worse, an institutional structure that encouraged convictions as a sign of concrete results. At present, there are at least 20 cases where Dr. Smith’s shoddy and biased worked are being investigated to see if a wrongful conviction had occurred. This is so serious that a number of individuals have been granted bail pending an outcome of a review of the work of Dr. Smith.

The example of Dr. Smith clearly shows that a properly qualified and admissible expert testimony can be powerful evidence in the eyes of a jury. Indeed, among the primary focuses of the Morin and Sophonow inquiries were the mishandling and improper testing of forensic evidence, reliance on unreliable scientific data and the tainted expert opinion testimony. So while the use of expert evidence has been admitted as an exception to the Hearsay rule, the objectivity of the expert cannot be assumed. The cases of Dr. Smith, Morin and Sophonowhave shown that tainted, tailored and unsubstantiated expert evidence, couched in scientific terms and language, based on unreliable fact and ultimately “junk science” has long been recognized as a leading cause of wrongful convictions.

On a more general level which applies to all the institutional factors that have been discussed, there is the serious issue of tunnel vision. Tunnel vision in this context is “the single minded and overly narrow focus on an investigation or prosecutorial theory so as to unreasonably color the evaluation of information received and one’s conduct in response to the information”. It is this form of tunnel vision that has been identified as a leading cause of wrongful convictions in Canada. Where the state institutional actors continue to seek convictions at “any cost”, tunnel vision will always be a worry to those of us concerned about wrongful convictions.

Skeptics have argued that an equally important problem are wrongful acquittals. Such a view is understandable in that no one wants to see crimes go unpunished. However, if we take the Golden Thread seriously (the presumption of innocence, proof beyond a reasonable doubt and the right to silence), the question to ask is not the result of the acquittal but why the prosecutor and police did not prepare a stronger case in the first place. The presumption of innocence cannot be turned on its head as a matter of public expediency. The police and prosecutors ought to be held to a higher standing to ensure that the cases they choose to prosecute are viable and strong cases. Currently, the test of “reasonable prospect of conviction” are empty words used by the police and prosecutors to allow almost any charge to continue through the system.

Furthermore, it would be incorrect to limit wrongful convictions to high profile cases. In a busy jurisdiction such as Peel, miscarriages of justice occur when the institutional players (prosecutors, judges, police and even defense counsel) encounter the “same old accused” which leads to institutional neglect and cynicism.

At least in the United Kingdom, there is an independent and arm’s length committee which has been established to recommend a review of cases where it is believed a wrongful conviction has occurred. In Canada, no such committee exits.

Acknowledging a mistake of a wrongful conviction can only go so far. As we have seen in the cases of Milgaard, Morin and Truscott (one can only imagine if the death penalty was not commuted by then Prime Minister Diefenbaker in 1960 how much worse this example would be or if the case would have been lost to time itself), empty words and money cannot bring back a person’s lost freedom and respect.

Changes in the culture of these powerful institutional players is the only way to reduce wrongful convictions. However, it may be a losing battle where the same players (police, prosecutors and scientists) measure success and in turn public funding, in the amount of charges and convictions they deliver to the public. If this attitude continues, there will always be a pressure to convict and as a result, an increasing probability of an innocent person being wrongfully convicted.

Contact
Contact Us
905-755-0104

Toll Free: 1844DATTLAW (1-844-328-8529)

295 Matheson Blvd. East
Mississauga, Ontario
L4Z 1X8
map it
Miguel Ozamiz
Miguel Ozamiz
05:00 12 Dec 19
I had a great experience with Aswani. He seems exceptionally suited to the role and exudes... confidence and expertise in all our dealings. I have had only one experience with him and his staff who got me out of a bind quite gracefully. I hope to never see them again but if needed would not hesitate to go back.read more
Brendon Colasso
Brendon Colasso
09:35 07 Dec 19
Aswani, you been nothing but the best and I cannot thank you for how much you helped me with my... case and I would recommend you to anyone out there who needs your help and advise You have been the support And inspiration that I required when there were no hopes. You all peeps out there, If you are reading this. It’s not to late.If you stuck in a situation where you need a legal advice or guidance. Reach out to Aswani. Trust me, you wouldn’t regret it abit It’s all worth it.. All the best to you Ashwani !!read more
Abhilash Reddy
Abhilash Reddy
17:55 01 Dec 19
Aswani handled my case with professionalism. He has an excellent knowledge and experience. I highly... recommend him.read more
Michelle Vieira
Michelle Vieira
16:09 29 Nov 19
Aswani Represented me in a case that was very scary and emotional for me . He did an amazing job at... keeping me calm and level headed throughout the process. We were successful with our outcome and I can’t thank him enough for the advice, support and knowledge he provided. He is very kind and can be aggressive when needed in the court room. I highly recommend Aswani to anyone who is in need of an outstanding lawyer who truly cares about each case/client he takes on .read more
Sanket More
Sanket More
04:07 24 Nov 19
Highly recommend Aswani Datt. Very professional and helpful. He won’t give you false hopes.... Helped my friend from a very complicated case which has changed his life for better. Thank you Aswani.read more
Ahmed Kadhim
Ahmed Kadhim
18:08 17 Nov 19
He helped my brother and he did great job he was very professional really smart and very... experienced, I would recommend him for my friends if they need his help.read more
Sunil Pattnaik
Sunil Pattnaik
21:39 27 Oct 19
Aswani, is honest, compassionate,. professional and smart lawyer. He understands and resolve any... challenges in a professional way. I recommend his service for anyone who is looking for real time help.read more
Sumit Joshi
Sumit Joshi
17:46 20 Oct 19
One of the best criminal lawyer around. Highly knowledgeable and an expert in his field. Excellent... client service as well. Highly recommend.read more
sonia sharda
sonia sharda
22:12 18 Oct 19
Aswani Datt is very Knowledgeable and professional lawyer. I highly recommend him for any of your... legal needs. His communication skills to explain and talk about your case is phenomenal.read more
Himanshu Joshi
Himanshu Joshi
19:20 18 Oct 19
Aswani Datt is very knowledgeable, honest & compassionate. He takes ownership for his clients & is... very thorough on the legal representation. He is very detailed & very clear on expectations. He always came well prepared and fought very hard for me. I will always be extremely grateful. It is with great enthusiasm that highly recommend him.read more
sukaina radhi
sukaina radhi
00:33 17 Oct 19
Great service, very professional ,he work really hard on his client cases and definitely would... recommend him to others.read more
Mike Kadhim
Mike Kadhim
18:53 16 Oct 19
Very professional extremely smart and and up to the point , he really cares about his clients he... deserve even more than 5 stars I would definitely recommend him to anybody who need his services , He helped me with my case and he approached it in a way with no doubt shows expertise and extreme professionalism.read more
Harpreet Lamba
Harpreet Lamba
14:52 28 Sep 19
Great service. Always available to hear your case and try the best to resolve it. I highly... recommend Aswani Dutt as a lawyerread more
Singer Squad
Singer Squad
02:40 14 Sep 19
Aswani is truly a professional lawyer, he is always honest to his clients, he is very nice and... friendly, i would strongly recommend him as your first choice -- Sincerely Assadread more
Kar Sevak
Kar Sevak
20:34 07 Sep 19
Hard working and honest lawyer. Straight forward. Saved our family and we owe the world to him. ... Thanks Mr. Datt.read more
Venugopal Nori
Venugopal Nori
23:32 03 Sep 19
Aswani takes ownership of the case and deals it professionally to give it a meaningful conclusion.... He is very reliable. Thanks Aswani Datt understands the situation and gives very good advice. He is very prompt in responding to any questions you might have.He provides expert legal advice. I will highly recommend him.read more
Dan C
Dan C
16:40 15 Aug 19
Very professional and knowledgeable, with an open and friendly attitude. He answered all my many... questions patiently and provided valuable advice on a complex matter. Thank you again!read more
Yash Menaria
Yash Menaria
04:42 08 Aug 19
Aswani is professional, thorough, and knowledgeable. I would recommend him highly to anyone seeking... legal counsel.read more
Nathan Forbes
Nathan Forbes
15:23 05 Jul 19
Aswani was introduced through a family friend and I was very pleased with his service. He was able... to provide a better outcome then I had initially envisioned. Communication was great throughout the process. He is knowledgeable, professional and delivers. I would highly recommend him as legal counsel.read more
D Parmar
D Parmar
22:24 23 Jun 19
Aswani is a very professional and knowledgeable lawyer and has handled our case with utmost care... and taking care of all minute details. Made us feel comfortable and kept us well informed. Highly recommend his service as a lawyer.read more
IRIS Consulting
IRIS Consulting
16:43 04 May 19
I strongly recommend Aswani to people who need legal consulting. He is extremely competent and... familiar with the system. He has handled some complex matters efficiently that I’d give him 5 stars. Keep up the amazing work Aswani. BR/Anandread more
Ryan Wolf
Ryan Wolf
23:24 21 Apr 19
Aswani k. Datt was randomly selected to represent me in a legal matter. He was professional,... efficient, kind, caring, accommodating and very patient. He promised a quick and speedy resolve on my matter. He delivered as promise. He is highly recommended, and i want to thank him for everything that he has done for me. He is a brilliant and wonderful lawyer!read more
Sharanbir Khudal
Sharanbir Khudal
23:01 18 Apr 19
An Absolutely intelligent officer of the law, and an even better human being. He makes you feel... comfortable and confident in your situation and will find ways to get you to your hopeful results in manners which you will not expect. I recommend him to everyone and anyone who needs legal help, not once, but as many times as necessary. If you’ve run across him for your legal needs, don’t look further.read more
Zulfiqar Shah
Zulfiqar Shah
14:10 10 Apr 19
I am trying to find words to describe our experience with Mr. Aswani, I find myself pondering how... to describe him. I find myself lost for words and a short precise description would be Brilliant and Professional Lawyer, Friendly person to deal with and whenever we met him there was always a warm friendly smile telling you to not to worry. Ones walks out with confidence that he has your back. These words are the minimum to describe him, at least from my experience. If for any reason anyone out there needs a Lawyer, I would extremely highly recommend Aswani K Dutt.read more
Ankur Gandhi
Ankur Gandhi
20:40 05 Mar 19
Best lawyer in town. Needed someone to represent me with my divorce case involving a child. He went... above and beyond. Trust me you won't go wrong if he's your lawyer. And when he gives you an advise please take it because he's only thinking in best interest of his client.read more
Next Reviews