Duo Ignored Talk About Social Distancing, Had Sex Outside Hospital
Despite warnings about “social distancing,” a couple decided to have sex in public outside a Florida hospital, according to cops who busted the duo on a pair of criminal charges. As detailed in arrest affidavits, Ann Marie Tucker, 45, and Albert Singletary, 37, were “found to be exposing sexual organs in plain view of the public”
Read MoreWoman, 36, Busted For Calling 911 To Complain Parents Shut Off Her Cellphone Service
A 36-year-old Ohio woman who called 911 to complain that her parents had shut off her cellphone service is facing a felony charge, records show. Seloni Khetarpal was arrested Thursday for disrupting public services after twice dialling the police emergency line and asking for cops to be dispatched to her family’s spacious Canton residence, which abuts the
Read More“Bag Full of Drugs”
Source: http://www.thesmokinggun.com/buster/cocaine/bag-full-of-drugs-bust-647390 After pulling a car over for speeding late Saturday afternoon, Florida cops searched the vehicle and discovered an array of narcotics–cocaine, Ecstasy, meth, fentanyl, and GHB–stashed inside a pouch labeled “Bag Full Of Drugs,” investigators report. According to police, the 2020 Kia was being driven by Ian Simmons, a 34-year-old Orlando resident. The only
Read MoreMandatory Victim Surcharge Struck down as Cruel and Unusual Punishment
As per the Supreme Court of Canada in: https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/17416/index.do The mandatory victim surcharge constitutes punishment, engaging s. 12 of the Charter , and its imposition and enforcement on several of the offenders, as well as the reasonable hypothetical offender, result in cruel and unusual punishment. The surcharge cannot be saved under s. 1 of the Charter . It is not necessary to consider whether s. 7 of the Charter is infringed.
Read MoreCertain Privacy for Text Messages – Law Catching up with Technology
Text messages that have been sent and received can, in some cases, attract a reasonable expectation of privacy and therefore can be protected against unreasonable search or seizure under s. 8 of the Charter . Whether a claimant had a reasonable expectation of privacy must be assessed in the totality of the circumstances. To claim s. 8 protection, claimants must establish that they had
Read MoreReply to “Book banning brings India’s Hindu extremism into plain view”
Original Article: https://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-debate/book-banning-brings-indias-hindu-extremism-into-plain-view/article17020690/ Mr. Omer Aziz’s recent article entitled “Book banning brings India’s Hindu extremism into plain view” is in my respectful submission misleading and deceptive. The central premise from which Mr. Aziz argues is the withdrawal of a badly written book on Hinduism published by Penguin India. From this premise, Mr. Aziz
Read MoreMaking a Threat? Don’t say it seriously!
While the accused was incarcerated, he had a telephone conversation with his ex‑girlfriend during which he repeatedly told her that he would kill her upon his release if she proceeded with her planned abortion of their child. The accused was charged with uttering threats. At trial, the ex‑girlfriend testified that the words uttered by the
Read MoreThe Govt is watching you if you are a Juror
Jury vetting by the Crown and police gives rise to a number of concerns. First is the prospect of the Crown and police joining forces to obtain a jury favourable to their cause. Second is the fundamental precept of our justice system that “justice should not only be done, but should manifestly and undoubtedly be
Read MoreFacing the Accuser – allowing for religious nonesense
The issue is when, if ever, a witness who wears a niqab for religious reasons can be required to remove it while testifying. Two sets of Charter rights are potentially engaged — the witness’s freedom of religion and the accused’s fair trial rights, including the right to make full answer and defence. An extreme approach
Read MoreProbation Orders
The probation orders imposed on the appellants were valid when made and no prior or subsequent sentences invalidated them, either prospectively or retrospectively. The phrase “imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years” relates only to the actual term of imprisonment imposed by a sentencing court at a single sitting. It does not refer to
Read More
